Book Review: Habits of a Successful Musician

I've written before about the importance of fundamentals in band rehearsal, and today I'd like to review one of the best resources I have found for that time in the high school concert band.

Habits of a Successful Musician, by Scott Rush and Rich Moon, is "a comprehensive curriculum for use during fundamentals time." The book has seven sections:

  1. Warm-Up
  2. Chorales
  3. Rhythm Vocabulary
  4. Rhythm Charts in a Musical Context
  5. Audition Sight-Reading by Level
  6. Audition Sight-Reading by Time Signature
  7. Music-Making Exercises

The section that became the most familiar to the band was Section One, Warm-Up. We used exercises from this section nearly every day. They include activities and areas of focus like stretching and breathing, long tones, articulation, dynamics, blend, balance, timing, and more. I liked the combination of brass lip slur patterns with percussion and and woodwind chromatic scales (in eighth notes and eighth-note triplets, ascending and descending). I also appreciated the dynamic exercise that has students play a major chord in one of four patterns (ppp-fff-pp, fff-ppp-fff, ppp-fff, or fff-ppp). I felt like it was easy to select a balance of exercises that helped my concert band grow in its areas of weakness. I used the scale section (majors, two octaves where appropriate, with some extra patterns tacked on to teach key) for playing tests throughout the year.

The second section, Chorales, was one of the student favorites. Eleven tunes were harmonized (and well-orchestrated!), from old hymns to Holst, and each was a pleasure to play. It was great to make music while warming up the group as well as to have opportunities to address pitch and balance in "simpler" music that students still enjoyed. I do wish there were more chorales, but there are a lot of other options out there for that kind of material!

The third section, Rhythm Vocabulary, was the least used in our band. It is laid out in 23 lines of progressively more complex rhythms. It moves quickly through time signatures (2/4, 3/4, 4/4, cut time, 6/8, 9/8, and 5/8) and common rhythm patterns in each. The instructions in the teacher book suggest using these pages to work on a counting system. I have typically focused more on this concept (I use 1e+a) in middle school, but at the end of this year, I could see how spending a little more time on it during the beginning of the year would be helpful to the high school students. (While the strongest students had few problems with new rhythms, many of my freshmen and sophomores showed some weakness in subdividing.)

Section Four also covered rhythm, and I used this section for playing tests. There are six pairs of exercises, with each pair having the same underlying rhythm. One exercises is strictly rhythm, and its pairs has a melody. They cover the material used in section three, and I found it very helpful to require students to work on them and record them while using a metronome. They are too tricky (really just unfamiliar) for students to read perfectly the first time, and they require students to subdivide in order to play them well. Each exercise is progressive, so it worked well to assign more experienced students a longer or later section in the exercise that was tested.

Sections Five and Six contain a total of 190 sight-reading exercises. The primary difference between the two is the lack of musical markings (dynamics, articulations, etc) in Section Five. We took breaks from these sections (especially when we had a lot of other full-band music to read through), but I found them helpful for building student confidence while sight-reading. I also appreciated the inclusion of challenging keys, and I thought that, because of this, the band improved its attention to key signatures as well. The variety of keys and time signatures was excellent. The melodies are not the catchiest, but they are musically sound and serve their purpose well.

The final section, Music-Making Exercises, is a single page with some instructions on improvising musically (e.g., "long notes should have direction and shape; they should intensify or decrescendo") and using solfege to help you become more musically literate. We didn't use these sections in band, but I have said just about everything on the page during rehearsal and used some very similar exercises in lessons and in class.

Students really liked using the book throughout the year, and that is saying something! Typically they get bored with the warm-up routine (and some still did), but most appreciated the variety of material and felt like it helped them and the band make solid progress. I have students in high school band for four years, though, so the biggest downside is that I have to find something different to use next year!

Real Book (sixth edition) Errata

I've been working on some tunes out of the Bb version of the Real Book, sixth edition, published by Hal Leonard. Though the book claims that "all of the notorious errors have been fixed," don't expect it to be completely accurate. It's frustrating to find errors the first time you read through a tune (or worse, to learn a mistake for a tune you work on), so to that end, I'm planning on compiling the errors I find here as I find them. You're welcome to submit errors to me and I'll post them here.

Bb Edition

Donna Lee – measure 29 should have a written Eb instead of E natural for the first note
Four – measure 11 should have a written Bb instead of B natural

Nica's Dream – Chords in the B section have several errors. B5 and B9 should have F-7. B6 and B10 should be just Bb7. I haven't heard a recording with dominant seventh chords and the extra two beats of F-7--instead I hear a regular ii-V that resolves either to I (the second and fourth lines) or to iii (a neat deceptive resolution).

All Editions

Jordu - bar 3 of the B section has the wrong rhythm. Beats 3 and 4 should be a dotted quarter and an eighth note instead of two quarters.

Take Five - missing chords in the B section. The first three bars are each missing the second chord, which in order should be Ab-6, Eb-7, and Cb7. The same omission occurs in bars 5-7 of the B section as well. Also, the final chord of the B section should be Bb7 instead of Bb-7.

Some Day My Prince Will Come - Bar 7 should be a minor 7 instead of a dominant 7 chord. [It's what is played on the Miles Davis recording as well as the original in Snow White. I found other lead sheets with the same error...perhaps someone has played it that way, but I don't think it sounds good. The ii chord in the key of Bb should be minor, and this tune stays pretty solidly in Bb.] 

(last updated 7/11/15)

Allora Aere Trombone (Plastic!) Review

If all you want is to see and hear a quick comparison of the Allora Aere and a student model Bach, see these two short videos.

Quiz

Which of these recordings is a plastic trombone? The four combinations of mouthpiece and instrument are plastic/plastic, plastic/metal, metal/metal, and metal/plastic. [Yes, I know I don't sound amazing on trombone]. See the answers at the bottom of the post.

I ordered an Allora Aere Trombone in blue back in December. It must have been a popular Christmas item because it was on backorder for more than two months! I paid about $120 with a percentage off coupon code, and so far I think it was a fair price for what I received.

Positives

  • sounds like a trombone
  • plays in tune (though what does that really mean on trombone?)
  • slide moves freely and has improved over the last month as I have played it more
  • comes with lots of "extras," including two plastic mouthpieces, a stand, cleaning supplies, and a bag that fits everything neatly
  • very light
  • blue! (or other colors)

Negatives

  • difficult if not impossible to get a brassy, edgy tone that is often characteristic of trombone
  • plastic slide is noisier than metal
  • slide lock is weak and tugging on the slide while locked releases the slide
  • included stand is adequate for holding the trombone but feels flimsy

The biggest issue I see with the Aere trombone is that it can't match the sound and power of my Bach TB-300. While trombone isn't my main instrument, I use it extensively while teaching because it is the easiest low instrument to pick up and play lines when needed. I also think I do an adequate job demonstrating tone for my younger trombonists, especially when I need to show them using more air for a bigger sound or toning it down to blend with the rest of the low voices. The Aere trombone is mostly fine for demonstrating these things, but I can't make it cut through an ensemble in the same way as my metal bone.

Looking at trombone currently on Craigslist, I see some trombones available used for $150. If I were looking for a trombone for a beginning student, I would almost certainly purchase one of these (Bundy, Bach, Yamaha, etc.) instead of the Allora Aere. That said, I can imagine a few reasons to get a plastic trombone. I've never taken complaints about the trombone's weight too seriously, but I could see using one with a student who needed the lightest trombone they could find (perhaps recovering from an arm/shoulder injury, or the very young). It is cool that it is blue and brings some spirit to pep band. I've also found it beneficial to play on the Aere trombone as a practice tool. I find that playing it at the level I want requires more air, and that translates to a bigger, better sound on whatever I play next (my regular trombone or trumpet).

Cosmetically, the Aere trombone looks great from far away. Close up, though, there are some rough spots. The joints on the ABS tubing show some extra adhesive. The mouthpiece receiver has some sort of white, powdery residue that I haven't managed to clean all the way out yet. The slide lock feels flimsy, and the socket connecting the bell and slide sections has a few rows of extra threads that make it feel not well thought out.

I do feel a metal mouthpiece gives a better sound that the included plastic ones (or the plastic Kelly 6 1/2AL I normally play on), but I think the difference is marginal.

Audio answers from samples at the top:

  1. Allora/Bach
  2. Allora/Kelly
  3. Bach/Bach
  4. Bach/Kelly

Listening back to myself, I don't hear as much of a difference in the recordings as I heard while playing.